SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(BOM) 2584

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Manish Pitale, Valmiki SA Menezes, JJ
Ramesh Manohar Madawi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.731 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.W. Mirza
For the Respondents: S.S. Doifode, V.H. Kedar

Criminal proceedings involving identical allegations as a departmental inquiry in which the accused was exonerated on merits are liable to be quashed under the inherent power of the High Court to prevent abuse of the process of law.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Inherent power of High Court - Availability of revisional remedy under Section 397 of the Cr.P.C. does not bar the exercise of inherent power under Section 482 when continuation of criminal proceedings constitutes an abuse of the process of law. (Para 17, 18)

(B) Departmental Inquiry vs. Criminal Prosecution - Exoneration in departmental proceedings - Where an accused is exonerated on merits in a departmental inquiry on the same set of allegations as those in criminal proceedings, such criminal trial cannot be allowed to proceed, as it would amount to an abuse of the process of law. (Para 19, 28)

(C) Penal Offence - Ingredients of criminal breach of trust and forgery - Mere existence of overwriting or errors in official records does not fulfill the legal requirements of criminal breach of trust or forgery without evidence of dishonest intention or deliberate fabrication of documents as defined under the penal statutes. (Para 26, 27)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, a public servant, faced allegations concerning financial irregularities and falsification of records in the maintenance of registers for fuel consumption. A departmental inquiry concluded that the applicant was not guilty of the primary charges, identifying only minor supervisory negligence for which the applicant had already undergone a censure penalty. Despite the exoneration in the departmental forum, criminal proceedings were initiated and a charge-sheet was filed. The applicant challenged the dismissal of his discharge application by the magistrate and sought the quashing of the entire criminal proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that the investigation for the criminal case was based on the identical allegations that formed the basis of the departmental inquiry. The statements of witnesses were contradictory, and the materials furnished in the charge-sheet failed to disclose any prima facie evidence of criminal intent. The applicant’s exoneration in the departmental inquiry on the merits rendered the continuation of the criminal prosecution unjustified and contrary to the principles of fair justice.

Issues: The main issues were whether criminal proceedings should be quashed when the accused has already been exonerated in a departmental inquiry on the same set of facts and whether the initiation of such proceedings after nine months of the alleged incident constitutes an abuse of the process of law.

Ratio Decidendi: Exoneration on merits in a departmental inquiry based on an identical set of facts as the criminal prosecution constitutes a valid ground for invoking inherent powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. When such an exoneration occurs, the continuation of criminal proceedings becomes an unnecessary harassment and is deemed an abuse of the court's process, given that the prosecution failed to demonstrate the essential ingredients of the alleged offences.

Result: Application allowed; FIR and charge-sheet quashed and set aside; order of magistrate set aside.

JUDGMENT (Per: Manish Pitale, J.)

Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the rival parties. Admit.

02] The applicant herein has approached this Court invoking inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), for quashing of First Information Report (F.I.R.) and charge-sheet for offences under Sections 409, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “I.P.C.”). By way of amendment, a further prayer is made for quashing and setting aside order dated 21.08.2020, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Arvi, whereby an application for discharge filed on behalf of the applicant, was dismissed.

03] On 26.10.2021, this Court had passed an order permitting amendment of the application for adding the aforesaid prayer, despite objection raised on behalf of the non-applicant No.1/State, by referring to the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. When this application was finally heard, the said objection was reiterated on behalf of the non-applicant No.1/State, as well as the non-applicant No.2 i.e. informant - complainant.

04] The sequence of events, leading to filing of the F.I.R. and initiation of criminal proceedings is that, the applicant at the relevant date was working as the Depot Manager of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”). On 07.03.2013, overwriting was allegedly noticed in a register maintained for diesel filled in the buses of the Corporation, as well as receipts issued by a private petrol pump from which the diesel was filled, as per an agreement between the Corporation and the Petrol Pump. It was alleged that when the Accountant of the Corporation noticed such overwriting and found that an inflated bill was sought to be prepared to the extent of 118 liters of diesel, he reported the same to the applicant i.e. the Depot Manager. Even as per the allegations, the applicant stopped the processing of the bills and payment towards diesel that was filled on the said date, in order to enquire into the matter.

05] One Mr. Dhotre, the Security and Vigilance Officer of the Corporation, was asked to enquire into the matter. He recorded statements of concerned persons, including co-accused Mr. Belge, working as Assistant and concluded that the overwriting and attempt at raising inflated bills to the extent of 118 liters of diesel, was carried out on the directions of the applicant i.e. the Depot Manager and that for excessive diesel amounting to Rs.6,353/-, the applicant had received cash amount of Rs.5,000/- from the employee of the concerned petrol pump, who was also arrayed as an accused. It appears that in pursuance of the findings given by the Security and Vigilance Officer, a censure was issued to the applicant and the matter was directed to be further enquired into.

06] On 02.12.2013 i.e. about 9 months after the alleged incident, the Security and Vigilance Officer submitted report to the Police Station at Arvi, making the aforesaid allegations against the applicant, in pursuance of which F.I.R. No.238 of 2013 dated 03.12.2013, was registered against the applicant and the aforesaid co-accused persons for offences under Sections 409, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C.

07] On the basis of the aforesaid material, during the course of departmental enquiry, charge-sheet dated 18.12.2013, was also issued to the applicant for the charges of conspiring with other persons to cause financial loss to the Corporation, indiscipline, negligence which caused serious loss to the Corporation as well as inconvenience to the public at large and misappropriation and cheating as regards the property of the Corporation.

08] In pursuance of issuance of charge-sheet, enquiry was conducted and statements of all persons concerned with the incident dated 07.03.2013, were recorded and enquiry report was prepared and forwarded to the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top