Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
PRAKASH D. NAIK, N. R. BORKAR, JJ
Rizwan Rahim Khan and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case with details of allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. settlement terms and agreement between the parties. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court decision to quash proceedings based on mutual consent. (Para 7) |
N. R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2024.
P.C . :
1. Not on board. Taken on Board.
2. The Petitioners are prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 498A, 354, 509, 504 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code ( for short ‘IPC’).
3. The proceedings are arising out of FIR dated 18/08/2022 registered with Mumbra Police Station vide C.R. No. 753 of 2022 at the instance of Respondent No. 2.
4. The Applicant No. 1 is the husband, the applicant No. 2 is the mother-in-law, Applicant No. 3 is the father- in-law, Applicant No. 4 is the sister-in-law and the Applicant No. 5 is the uncle of Petitioner No. 1. The grievance of the complainant was that after her marriage with Petitioner No. 1, she was ill-treated by the accused.
She was assaulted and subjected to harassment.
5. The parties have resolved their differences and agreed for quashing the impugned proceedings. They have executed the consent terms. In view of the settlement, the proceedings initiated by Respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
