Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NITIN W. SAMBRE, MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ
Wasudeo @ Wasu S/o Hanuman Thakre – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenged the legality of an externment order. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of justification for the externment based on insufficient evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents contend procedural correctness, citing alternative remedies. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court evaluation of the externment order based on existing legal standards. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's decision to quash the externment order due to lack of evidence. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON : 24.04.2025 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 05.05.2025 JUDGMENT (PER : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , J.) :-
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to challenge the order of externment dated 04.03.2025 passed by respondent No.3 externing the petitioner for a period of 09 months from the District of Chandrapur.
3. In the instant matter, respondent No.2, sent a proposal for the externment of the petitioner under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Police Act , 1951. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer was appointed to investigate the externment proposal. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
