BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Chandrachud, Gajendragadkar, JJ
Naik P. V. v. State of Maharashtra
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to government resolution and notices. (Para 1 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. arguments against the validity of discharge. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. constitutional protection under article 311. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. temporary and permanent allotment provisions. (Para 22 , 27 , 56) |
| 5. judicial outcome ordering retention of petitioners in service. (Para 66 , 68 , 70) |
1. This petition and numerous other petitions are filed in this Court for challenging the validity of the Government Resolution, dated March 18, 1966, as clarified by the two circular letters each dated April 16, 1966. The petitioners also challenge the notices of discharge, each dated April 5, 1966, terminating the services of each of the petitioners and allotting them to services of Zilla Parishads as of and from August 16, 1966. In other petitions also similar notices are challenged. The petitioners have prayed for quashing and setting aside of the notices of discharge and also for a mandamus restraining the Government from allotting the petitioners to the services of Zilla Parishad, Dhulia.
2. The questions arising in this petition being common to several petitions filed in this Court are of general importance in

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.