Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
, J
Arun Kumar Krishnarao Balpande v. Wasudeorao Kondbaji Ganar and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of facts regarding man's death and initial allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accusations made by the petitioner against the respondents concerning press statements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal grounds for maintainability and suo motu jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. discussion on the role of the advocate general's opinion regarding contempt. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. consideration of specific allegations made against the first respondent. (Para 17 , 20) |
| 6. allegations published by respondents and the implications. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. conclusions on various respondents' culpability regarding contempt. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. final orders, including acceptance of apologies and sentencing. (Para 28 , 29) |
1. By this criminal contempt petition, the petitioner seeks to invoke the suo motu jurisdiction of this Court to punish the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 14 for having committed criminal contempt of Courts.
2. The facts as could be ascertained from the petition are that on 28-3-1994, dead body of Smt. Manorama Kamble was found in the house of one Shri Sham Dewani, a practising Advocate. It was first reported to be an accidental death by the said Shri Sham Dewan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
