BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S. B. Deshmukh, J.
Hari – Appellant
Versus
Mahadu s/o Kerba – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. substantial question of law admitted. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments regarding the nature of the decree. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis of the decree's implications. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal principles established regarding extension of time. (Para 11 , 14) |
| 6. final judgement and order issued. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. This Second Appeal No.244 of 1985 is directed against the judgement and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 389 of 1983 by the learned District Judge, Nanded on 29th October, 1985. Learned District Judge, Nanded held that due to failure of the plaintiff to deposit the balance amount of the sale consideration
within the time stipulated by the trial Court, the suit, after the expiry of the given period automatically, stood dismissed. The learned District Judge, Nanded further held that the appeal thus, became infructuous and is, therefore, disposed of accordingly, in the light of the matter, without disturbing the judgement and decree of the trial Court.
2. The facts, in short, may be sum-marised, as follows:
(a) The appellant, in the second appeal, was the plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No. 270 of 1982 and on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.