Sanjay Namdeorao Suryawanshi (Died through LRs.) v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S.V. Gangapurwala, J
Sanjay Namdeorao Suryawanshi (Died through LRs.) v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None Mentioned
For the Respondents: None Mentioned

Table of Content
1. seizure of the vehicle due to involvement in illegal transportation of timber. (Para 2 , 7 , 8 , 13)
2. strict regulations under the indian forest act for vehicle seizure and compensation claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 18 , 20)
3. judgment dismissing the petition due to lack of evidence and compliance. (Para 22)

1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respective parties.

2. The petitioner claiming to be owner of transport vehicle of Tata make bearing registration No. MH - 22/497, which was purchased by him under the Government Scheme being an educated unemployed youth, has questioned the action on the part of the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 in detaining his vehicle for commission of forest offence under the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and has prayed for issuance of directions to the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 2,58,500/- to the petitioner towards loss caused to him due to illegal withholding of his vehicle.

3. The petitioner claims that, upon a request made by the petitioner, Mahatma Fule Magasvargiya Vikas Mahamandal, Parbhani had sanctioned a loan of Rs. 3,01,432/- for purchase of Tata Tempo, against which he got possession of a Tata Tempo Tra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3

BOMBAY HIGH COURTS.V. Gangapurwala, JSanjay Namdeorao Suryawanshi (Died through LRs.) v. State of Maharashtra and Others

Cases Referred (2)

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
S.V. Gangapurwala, J
Sanjay Namdeorao Suryawanshi (Died through LRs.) v. State of Maharashtra and Others