SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 24

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
K. K. Tated, J.
Rajbahadur Yadav and Others v. Rizvi Estates and Hotels Pvt. Ltd.


1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present Civil Revision Application is preferred by unsuccessful tenants challenging the order dt. 27/28.11.2008 passed by Appellate Bench of Small Causes Court at Bandra in Revision Application No. 60 of 2008 upholding the judgment and order of the Trial Court dated 3.12.2007 passed in Execution Application No. 2258 of 2006 in RAE Suit No. 1854 of 1970 whereby the Execution Application was allowed and respondent Company was allowed to execute the decree of eviction passed in the suit which is finally confirmed in Writ Petition No. 37 of 1992 and Special Leave Petition SC (D) 33479 of 2006.

3. The applicants herein are the heirs and legal representatives of the original deceased defendant no. 2 and respondents in Execution Application. The respondent hereinabove is the applicant in the Execution Application. The respondent Company herein was not a party to the suit but was joined as respondent no. 13 in Appeal No. 103 of 1983 filed by the original defendants challenging the eviction decree passed in the present proceeding. Few facts of the matter are as under:

4. RAE Suit No. 1854 of 1970 was decreed by the trial court by judgment an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top