SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 359

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.M. BADAR, J
Ashabai and Others v. Baban and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Chapalgaonkar
For the Respondents: Shri Upadhye

1. By this appeal under S.173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [For short, hereinafter referred to as "MV Act"], appellants / original claimants are challenging the judgment and award dated 3-112009, passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, in M.A.C.P. No. 138/2005, thereby rejecting claim for compensation led by appellants / original claimants on account of death of Kalyan Kothi in the alleged vehicular accident which took place on 9-9-2004 at Masrat Nagar, Beed. Respondent no.1 is the owner of the truck allegedly involved in the said accident; respondent no.2 is its insurer whereas respondent no.3 was allegedly working as driver on the said truck on the date of the accident. For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred to in their original capacity.

2. Brief facts leading to the institution of the present appeal can be summarized thus

(a) Initially claimants who are dependent legal representatives of deceased Kalyan Kothi filed the petition under S.163A of the MV Act, claiming compensation on account of death of Kalyan Kothi as per structured formula contending that he died because of accident arising out use of motor vehicle i.e. truck bea


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top