SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3781

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
N/A, N/A
Complainant – Appellant
Versus
Opponent No. 1 – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the complaint. (Para 1 , 2)
2. procedure adopted for the complaint. (Para 3 , 4)
3. legal findings on entitlement and claims. (Para 5)

1. Complainant has filed this consumer complaint against opponent for getting possession of flat alongwith other reliefs. Brief facts of the case are as under :

2. Opp.No.1 alongwith other opponents are the owners and developers of plot of land bearing CTS No. 122, Tika No. 1 lying at Village Chendani Koliwada, Thane (E), Tal. Dist. Thane. Opp.No.1 to 3 have jointly constructed a building on the said plot and the said building is known as Anusaya Apartment. Complainant was in need of residential accommodation. Hence, he had come in touch with Opp.No.1 who made representation to complainant to sell flat. Believing the representations made by Opp.No.1, complainant agreed to purchase flat from Opp.No.1. In view of the same, a M.O.U. was executed in respect of the said flat No. G - 1 having carpet area 360 sq.ft. situated in Anusaya Apartment constructed on land bearing CTS No. 122, Tika No. 1 lying at Village Chendani Koliwada, Thane (E), Tal. Dist. Thane in between complainant and Opp.No.1 on 23/3/2016. Complainan









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top