Back
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
S. P. Tavade (President), *S. T. Barne (Judicial Member)
Dr. Zakaria – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Vikram Pawar and Yashwant Pawar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction-related objections and amendments in consumer complaints are pivotal. (Para 1 , 2 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. establishing the grounds for jurisdiction is essential. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. proper amendments uphold the validity of the orders despite objections. (Para 10 , 11) |
1. The revision petitioner Dr. Zakaria has preferred this revision against the order of District Forum , Central Mumbai date 16.12.2021. This revision petitioner is the opponents and respondents Dr. Vikram Pawar and Yashwant Pawar are the complainants in the consumer complaint No. 56/2020 before the Dist. Consumer Forum.
2. It is the contention of petitioner that the respondents have filed consumer complaint before Dist. Forum, Central Mumbai on 28.2.2020 under Consumer Protection Act 1986 . On giving appearance before District Forum , this revision petitioner has filed application on 20.6.2020 raising objection as to pecuniary jurisdiction with a prayer to return the complaint for proper presentation. The respondents i.e. original complainants have submitted application for amendment to reduce the pecuniary jurisdiction . However, District Forum has rejected his objection as to pecuniary juris
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
