SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3785

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
S. P. Tavade (President), *S. T. Barne (Judicial Member)
Dr. Zakaria – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Vikram Pawar and Yashwant Pawar – Respondent


1. The revision petitioner Dr. Zakaria has preferred this revision against the order of District Forum , Central Mumbai date 16.12.2021. This revision petitioner is the opponents and respondents Dr. Vikram Pawar and Yashwant Pawar are the complainants in the consumer complaint No. 56/2020 before the Dist. Consumer Forum.

2. It is the contention of petitioner that the respondents have filed consumer complaint before Dist. Forum, Central Mumbai on 28.2.2020 under Consumer Protection Act 1986 . On giving appearance before District Forum , this revision petitioner has filed application on 20.6.2020 raising objection as to pecuniary jurisdiction with a prayer to return the complaint for proper presentation. The respondents i.e. original complainants have submitted application for amendment to reduce the pecuniary jurisdiction . However, District Forum has rejected his objection as to pecuniary jurisdiction by order dt.16.12.2021 and allowed the amendment application of respondents / complainants. It is the contention of revision petitioner that he has raised objection immediately on appearance which was supposed to be decided then and there. The order passed by District Commission / Foru














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top