IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
R.I. CHAGLA, FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ
Arrow Business Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interplay of sarfaesi act and ibc (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments of petitioner regarding ownership rights (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. bank's submissions supporting sarfaesi actions (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. role of the amicus curiae in understanding moratorium effects (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. analysis of sarfaesi act provisions (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. key judicial decisions impacting ownership transfer (Para 23 , 30) |
| 7. court's findings on ownership and moratorium effect (Para 33) |
| 8. dismissal of the writ petition (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
(Per Farhan P. Dubash, J)
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
A] Factual overview…………………………………………………… 4 – 7
B] Submissions of the Petitioner……………………………………… 8 – 10
C] Submissions of Respondent No. 1/Bank…………………………… 10
D] Submissions of Respondent No. 2…………………………………… 11 – 12
E] Submissions of Respondent No. 3…………………………………… 12
F] Submissions of the Amicus Curiae…………………………………… 13 – 15
G] Analysis of SARFAESI Act & SARFAESI Rules…………………… 15 – 20
H] Transfer of ownership of secured asset – when complete? ………… 20 – 26
I] Decision in Indian Overseas Bank (supra) ………………………… 26 – 30
J] Effect of interim-moratorium……………………………………… 30 – 34
K] Decision in Celir


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.