HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HONBLE JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LIMITED NAGPUR THR. AUTH. SIGNATORY KAILASH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
ABHIRUCHI VISION PRIVATE LIMITED KOLKATTA – Respondent
WP/5176/2025
##PAGE1##
2025:BHC-NAG:14914
2312WP5176-25.odt 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 5176 OF 2025
Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited, F8, MIDC Industrial
Area, Hingna Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440016,
Through its authorized signatory Kailash Sharma, Age :
58 years, Occ: Service, R/o c/o F-8, MIDC Industrial
Area, Hingna Road, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440016. PETITIONER
VERSUS
Abhiruchi Vision Private Limited, 10, Princep Street, 3rd Floor,
Kolkatta, West Bengal 700072. Through authorized Signatory. RESPONDENT
______________________________________________________________
Shri Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate with Shri Akshat Goel and Shri R.G.
Pandey, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Deven Chauhan, Senior Advocate with S/Shri C.S. Dhore, A.D. Chaudhari
and C.J. Dhruv, counsel for the respondent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE ON WHICH ARGUMENTS WERE HEARD : OCTOBER 07, 2025
DATE ON WHICH JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCWED : DECEMBER 2 3 , 2025
JUDGMENT
RULE. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally with
consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 25.06.2025 passed by
the Court of District Judge-2, Nagpur rejecting the application filed by the
petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Order 7 Rule 10 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’) read with Section 15 of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the Act of 2015).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
3. The petitioner is the original defendant in the suit filed by the
respondent for recovery of an amount of Rs.104,43,67,347.94 along with
interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The parties are hereinafter referred
##PAGE2##2312WP5176-25.odt 2 Judgment
to as the plaintiff and the defendant according to their status in the suit
for the sake of convenience.
4. The plaintiff claims tobe a Non-BankingFinancial Company (NBFC)
and the defendant is a company duly incorporated and registered under
the Companies Act 1956 having business of manufacturing variety of irons
and specialty in steel. The defendant-Company and other companies
belonging to Jayaswal family including a corporate entity viz. Corporate
Ispat Alloys Limited (CIAL) had availed financial facilities and loans from
various lenders and banks for approximately Rs.139 Crores for Strip Mill
Division, which is one of the projects of CIAL. In the month of July-2008
there was a family separation and settlement by which various companies
owned by the members of Jayaswal family were divided amongst them in
between two groups; one being Basant Lal Shaw Group; and other being
Manoj Kumar Jayaswal Group. As per the settlement agreed between the
two groups CIAL came to the share of Manoj Kumar Jayaswal group.
While one project of CIAL viz. Strip Mill Division alongwith its assets and
liabilities got demerged from CIAL and merged with the defendant which
formed part of Basant Lal Shaw group.
5. It is the plaintiff’s case that the liability of discharging loans of strip
mill division fell upon defendant and accordingly from the month of
August-2008 onwards the defendant commenced repayment of loan to the
bankers of Strip Mill Division and in view of various correspondences, the
defendant company acknowledged the debt of the bankers. Thereafter, in
the month of August-2010 the defendant stopped repayment of the
##PAGE3##2312WP5176-25.odt 3 Judgment
lenders of Strip Mill Division and therefore CIAL which belonged to Manoj
Kumar Jayaswal group started making payments from August-2010 to
March-2013 for and on behalf of the defendant to ensure that the account
of Strip Mill Division did not turn into non-performing asset (NPA). It is
alleged that during this period CIAL made payment of more than Rs.104
Crores to the lenders of Strip Mill Division for and on behalf of the
defendant. In this background, after a dispute arose between the
members of Jayaswal family, the matte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.