HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. G. AVACHATHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB DHARMAJI SHINDE
MOHIT RAJU CHOPRA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
--APPLN/4756/2024
##PAGE1##
2025:BHC-AUG:38067-DB
1 Cri.APPLN.4756.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4756 OF 2024
1. Mohit Raju Chopra
2. Raju Laxminarayan Chopra
3. Priti Raju Chopra
All R/o.Flat No.03
Mahaveer Darshan Building
Jivdani Complex, V.S.Road, Virar
Tal.Vasai, Dist.Palghar. … APPLICANTS
VERSUS
1. The State of Maharashtra
through in charge of
Srirampur City Police Station
Srirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar
2. Bharat Arjundas Narang
R/o. Zulelal Panth, Tambe Chawl
Ward No. 1 Srirampur,
Dist.Ahemednagar. … RESPONDENTS
…
Advocate for the Applicants : Mr. Ajay Mishra
AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. Jayshri P. Reddy
…
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 24.12.2025
JUDGMENT ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) :
1. Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the
consent of the parties the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission.
##PAGE2##2 Cri.APPLN.4756.2024.odt
2. By this criminal application filed under Section 528 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicants are seeking
quashment of the FIR No.0469/2024 registered with Shrirampur City
Police Station dated 19.04.2024 for the offences punishable under
Sections 306, 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for
short the IPC) and the consequential charge-sheet filed pursuant to the
same.
3. Facts giving rise to filing of this Criminal Application are as
follows :
i. The Respondent No.2 – informant lodged the FIR with
Shrirampur Police Station alleging that his deceased daughter,
Tanvi got married with the applicant No.1 on 16.02.2021. He
had performed their marriage gracefully by spending
Rs.25,00,000/-, however, the applicants No.1 to 3 were
harassing deceased Tanvi by taunting her that the marriage
performed by the informant was not as per their pleasure and by
not offering proper respect. It is also alleged that the deceased
Tanvi because of said ill-treatment given by the applicants No.1
to 3 was under tremendous mental stress. Once when she
suffered fracture to her right leg, the applicants No.1 to 3 did not
take proper care nor even bothered to meet her. She always
##PAGE3##3 Cri.APPLN.4756.2024.odt
used to make a grievance with the informant that no meaning
left in her life to survive anymore and she is experiencing
suicidal thoughts or feelings. However, the informant used to
console her everytime.
ii. It is further alleged that from September 2022 to February 2024,
deceased Tanvi started residing separately with her husband
(applicant no.1) at Malad, Mumbai, in rented flat. She was
doing a private job at Vikroli, Mumbai. It is further alleged that
the applicants No .2 and 3 were not allowing the applicant No.1
to stay with her, as a result of which deceased Tanvi was feeling
lonely and she was kept away from the love and affection of
applicant No.1. It is further alleged that the applicants No.2 and
3 visited at her rented flat in the month of February 2024 and
threatened her on account of demand of money from the
informant.
iii. It is further alleged that deceased Tanvi thereafter came to her
parental home, however, she was under depression and mental
stress because of mental and physical harassment and ill-
treatment meted out by the applicants No.1 to 3. It is further
alleged that she was always thinking of committing suicide. On
11.03.2024 she went missing as a result of which the
Respondent No.2/informant lodged a missing report with the
##PAGE4##4 Cri.APPLN.4756.2024.odt
police station, however, on 12.03.2024 at 02:00 am she was
found lying unconscious in industrial area at Shrirampur.
Thereafter, she was taken to the hospital where she was declared
as dead. The casue of death is shown as consumption of
poisonous substance. Hence, Respondent No.2 lodged the FIR
against the applicants No.1 to 3.
4. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the
applicants No.1 to 3 are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in
the impugned crime. It is further contended that they have neither
subjected the deceased to harassment nor there was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.