SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 2018

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Bibhas Ranjan De, J
Ramesh Chandra Hota – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal – Respondent
CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION | C.R.R. 385 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Rajdeep Das, Mr. D. Gupta, Ms. Sharmistha Basak, Ms. Sagarika Banerjee
For the Respondents:

The execution of orders by a Consumer Forum must comply with statutory procedures under the Consumer Protection Act.

Headnote:In a revisional application under C.R.R. 385 of 2025, the court analyzed the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, emphasizing the procedural requirements for execution of orders (Sections 47 and 71). The petitioner contested a non-bailable warrant issued against him by the Consumer Forum, arguing for adherence to statutory procedures regarding trial. The court found a strong case for the petitioner, admitted the application, and temporarily stayed the execution order while ordering a bond for the petitioner's interim release.

Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Rajdeep Das Mr. D. Gupta Ms. Sharmistha Basak Ms. Sagarika Banerjee …..For the Petitioner This revisional application has been filed with a prayer for setting aside the order No.20 dated 14.07.2025 passed by the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Siliguri in connection with Execution Application No.EA/4 of 2023 arising out of Consumer Complaint Case No.CC/2/2022 under the Consumer Protection Act, wherein learned Commissioner issued a non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the Hon’ble Member of the learned State Consumer Forum passed an order on 29th September, 2023 directing all the opposite parties including the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.13,35,762/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum to the complainant from the date of maturity till the date of reimbursement. They were further directed to pay a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- towards mental pain and agony to the complainant along with litigation cost of Rs.25,000/- and the order was to be complied with within 45 days from the date of the order.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that particular order dated 29th September, 2023, was put into execution being No. EA/4 of 2023 wherein learned Forum pried into the track of Section 72 by issuing warrant as well as by sending the petitioner to the Jalpaiguri Central Jail.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has referred to the provisions of Section 47 and Section 71 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and submits that order passed by the Consumer Forum can only be executed through the procedure prescribed under the provisions of Section 71 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 .

It is further submitted that Section 72 is prescribed for trial of the offences by exercise of power of Judicial Magistrate of First Class and according to the provisions of Section 72 (3), the offence has to be tried summarily by the Forum.

That apart, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has referred to the observations of the Coordinate Bench in CRR 4672 of 2022, CRR 2955 of 2022 as well as CRR

1499 of 2024.

It is submitted that to execute the order passed under Section 47 , the Forum shall have to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 71 of the Act. In the same manner as if it were a decree made by a Court in a suit under the provision of Order XXI of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, I find a strong arguable case in favour of the petitioner and accordingly, the revisional application stands admitted.

Petitioner is directed to serve notice upon the opposite party no.1/State through the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court and also upon the opposite party no.2 through Speed Post with acknowledgement due and file an affidavit of service on the returnable date.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has also prayed for stay of the order impugned, dated 14.07.2025 passed by the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Siliguri in connection with Execution Application No.EA/4 of 2023 arising out of Consumer Complaint Case No.CC/2/2022 as well as for releasing the petitioner from the Judicial custody, Jalpaiguri Central Jail, otherwise the very purpose of filing of the revisional application shall stand frustrated.

Considering all the facts and circumstances, the proceeding in connection with order dated 14.07.2025 passed by the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Siliguri in connection with Execution Application No.EA/4 of 2023 arising out of Consumer Complaint Case No.CC/2/2022 be stayed for a limited period only i.e. till one week after the ensuing Puja Vacation, 2025 or until further order, whichever is earlier.

Considering all the fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top