Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Nikhil Nath Bhattacharjee, J
Union of India and Others v. M/s. Binani Consultants (P) Ltd. and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against judgment regarding telephone service. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties entered into agreement for operating telephone pay phones. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. revision of commission rates by government notification. (Para 4) |
| 4. trial judge's analysis based on supreme court precedents. (Para 5) |
| 5. arguments presented by appellants focusing on contractual obligations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. respondent's contention against reduction of commission and arbitration validity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. court's perspective on disputes over agreements and public law rights. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. response to commission changes as policy decision and applicability. (Para 15 , 16 , 19) |
| 9. final verdict on legality of commission reduction. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 10. conclusion of the judgment and agreement by justice. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 19th of August, 1993, allowing the Writ application and directing the appellant to reconnect the telephone lines of the respondent which were disconnected for nonpayment of pay phone bills, and to accept the call charges on the basis of original agreement. The appellants were also restrained from reducing the rate of commission of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
