Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Ajai Kumar Jain and Others v. State of West Bengal and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint context and allegations against petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of direct involvement. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. principle of vicarious liability in company law. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. observations on fir content and its implications. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. basis for allowing or quashing complaints. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. final observations and outcome of the case. (Para 46 , 49) |
1. The petitioners have approached this court praying for quashing of the proceeding of G.R. Case No. 925 of 2008 under S.120B / 420/468/471 IPC, in connection with Hare Street Police Station Case No. 180 dated 05.4.2008, pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 5th Court, Calcutta.
2. C hronological event leading to this case is that on January 18, 2008, opposite party no. 2 filed a complaint under S.156(3) of the r.P. . before the learned hief Metropolitan Magistrate, alcutta alleging offences under S.420/467/468/471/120B IPC against Siemens India Ltd., J. Schubert, Harminder Singh and Tata Share Registry Ltd.
3. None of the petitioners were named or even referred to in that complaint an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
