SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 42

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
MD EHTESHAM UDDIN – Appellant
Versus
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS – Respondent


OD- 2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

ORIGINAL SIDE. WPO/410/2025

MD EHTESHAM UDDIN

VS

KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Date: 8th January, 2026

Appearance

Mr. Arif Ali, Adv. (VC)

Mr. Sarban Bhattacharya, Adv.

Mr. Sagar Dutta, Adv.

..for the petitioner

Ms. Piyali Sengupta, Adv.

Ms. Manisha Nath, Adv.

…for the KMC

Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Adv.

Ms. Priyanka Jana, Adv.

….for the State

Mr. Saikat Basu, Adv. Mr. Rashin Singh, Adv.

Mr. Debraj De, Adv.

…for the respondent nos.5, 7(a) and 7(b)

Mr. Supratik Basu, Adv.

….for the respondent no.10

Ms. Ipsita Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Rabiul Islam, Adv.

…for the respondent no.11

Mr. Diptimoy Talukder, Adv.

Mr. T. Talukder, Adv.

Mr. D. Ghosh, Adv.

…for the respondent no.12

1. Pursuant to the order dated 6th November, 2025, the Municipal authorities have filed a detailed report in respect of the six premises in respect whereof illegal constructions have been complained of. As per the aforesaid report, it would transpire that the municipal authorities have detected illegal construction

in respect of four several premises as per the following particulars:-

a. 168/P, Keshab Chandra Sen Street, Ward-37, Borough-V

b. 8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top