SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 424

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
TAPASI SAHA@TAPASHI SAHA – Appellant
Versus
MRIDUL KANTI DAS AND ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.

1. A defendant in a suit for declaration, injunction and cancellation of title deed has assailed the order No. 35 dated October 1, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division at Jalpaiguri in Title Suit No. 155 of 2019.

2. For the sake of convenience parties herein are referred to as ‘plaintiff’ and ‘defendant’ in the manner as they are appearing in the title suit.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the defendant has submitted that, the defendant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 stating that, the plaint filed by the plaintiffs did not disclose any cause of action. He has referred to the allegations made in the plaint. He has also referred to the contentions of the defendant in the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. He has pointed out that, the application of the defendant was filed on January 13, 2020. He has also pointed out that, the plaintiffs had filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on January 27, 2020.

4. Relying upon 2023 Volume 4 Calcutta High Court Notes 320 (Shri Kamal Kishor Jhawar vs. Shri Sunil Jhawar and other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top