Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J
Sanghamitra Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contractual obligations for property transfer (Para 2 , 13 , 14 , 18) |
| 2. discrimination in sale deed execution (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. respondent's defense based on policy (Para 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. inaction by authorities in deed execution (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court's directive for execution of sale deed (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J:
1. This instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking direction upon the respondents and/or their agents, servants, assigns and/or representatives to rescind and/or cancel and/or withdraw the memo no. 191/KMDA/Estate (MM)/Purba/Ph- II/06/FCFS dated 08.03.2020 as Annexure P-8 of the writ petition and further prays for direction upon the respondents and/or representatives to execute the deed of sale of the apartment in favour of the petitioners forthwith.
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The brief facts, leading to the filing of this writ petition, are as under:
a. The KMDA envisaged a scheme to build a housing complex, namely, Purba housing, at 1582/2, Rajdanga Main Road, Police Station - Kasba, Kolkata - 700 107 consisting of 361 residential apartments in 5 nos of 8-storied buildings, 4 nos of 6-storied buildings,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
