Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas, JJ
NIRMAL CHANDRA BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of qualifying marks improperly affected selection outcomes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. disqualification based on newly introduced criteria unfairly impacts applicants. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. equal treatment underscores service jurisprudence, implications of judicial findings. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's directive ensures compliance with established judicial determinations. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. Briefly stating the facts leading to filing of this writ petition is that one Pritam Ghosal and present petitioner were unsuccessful candidates in the process of selection to the post of Krishi Prayukti Sahayak in the same selection process. Being aggrieved by introduction of qualifying marks for interview, leading to their disqualification both filed individual Original Applications before the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal (“Tribunal” for short). The present petitioner’s O.A was 741 of 2019, whereas Pritam Ghosal’s OA was filed thereafter and numbered as O.A 940 of 2019. It is their common case that as per advertisement the written examination comprised of total 150 marks (Part I- 120 marks and part II- 30 marks). 15 marks were allotted for interview. The advertisemen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
