Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Shri B. Anand, A
S.I. Data Ram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police (Delhi Police) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay in disciplinary appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for condonation related to personal circumstances. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. dispute of applicant's grounds by respondents. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal precedence regarding delays and limits. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final court ruling on delay. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J):
Both the captioned Original Applications (OAs) have been filed by the same applicant challenging the orders of penalty pursuant to disciplinary proceedings and in both the accompanying Miscellaneous Applications (MAs), he has sought condonation of delay in filing of the respective OAs. Since, besides facts are substantially common and the grounds in support of the claim in the MAs and OAs are identical, both the MAs have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common order.
2. In OA No. 745/2023, the applicant has challenged the Appellate Authority order dated 30.08.2017, Disciplinary Authority order dated 30.06.2016 and enquiry findings/report dated 02.05.2016. In OA No. 746/2023, he has challenged Appellate Authority order dated 30.08.2017, Disciplinary Authority
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
