Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Lakhvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. listing parties and cases together. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicants seek reinstatement post-acquittal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. procedural history of terminations and remands. (Para 6 , 7 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. acquittal entitles reinstatement with benefits. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. ssc denial of nominations justified terminations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. identical charges; acquittal binds department. (Para 16 , 17 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. follow precedent and national litigation policy. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. reinstate with notional benefits. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
ORDER
Per: SH. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR MEMBER (J):
1. All the above eight Original Applications are taken up together for disposal, as a common question of law and facts are involved in all these cases. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the facts are being extracted from O.A.No.060/95/2023 (Lakhvir Singh & Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors.) and the said case has been treated as a lead case.
2. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 against the inaction of the respondents in not reinstating the applicants into service pursuant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
