Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.S.Latif, Judicial Member, Prasant Kumar, Administrative Member
Samiullah Salik – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of flawed naib tehsildar selection and prior writs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's relief prayers and respondents' non-reply. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. admission due to non-rebuttal of contentions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. non-speaking orders violate natural justice. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. quash order and direct fresh consideration. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Prasant Kumar, Member (Admn.) :-
Initially this case was filed by the petitioner before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Srinagar wherein it was registered as WP (C) No. 3444 of 2019. The Hon’ble High Court was pleased to issue notice on 02.12.2019 with liberty to the petitioner to serve the private respondents through publication in the two local dailies having wide circulation. Subsequently, in terms of Section 29 of the CAT Act, the case came to be transferred to Jammu/Srinagar Bench of the Tribunal vide Hon’ble High Court’s order dated 16.09.2020, wherein it was registered as TA
2. The petitioner has moved this Tribunal with this TA/WP(C) praying for grant of the following relief:-
“(i) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing impugned Government Order No. 180-Rev of 2016 dated 06.12.2016.
(i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
