Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Suresh Kumar Kathpalia – Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions through Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of promotional eligibility based on seniority. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. argument centered on appropriate application of rules and available vacancies. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :
This Review Application has been filed by the original applicant seeking review of the order dated 28.02.2023 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 3182/2016.
2. The order dated 28.02.2023 passed by this Tribunal in OA No. 3182/2016, reads as under:
“By way of filing this OA, the applicant is seeking the following main reliefs:
“(i) To declare the action of the respondents in not promoting the applicant to Senior Principal Private Secretary (Sr. PPS) in the Pay Band 3 (PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100 + Grade Pay Rs. 7600), before his superannuation on 31.10.2015, even after inclusion of his name in the Panel of Senior Principal Private Secretary (Sr. PPS) at S. No. 85 for the Select List Year 2015 for 89 vacancies approved by the UPSC as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory.
(ii) To declare the action of promoting similarly placed empanelled officers in the Select List for 2015 as Senior Principal Private Secretary (Sr. PPS) in the Pay Band (PB-3 Rs. 15600-39100 + Grade Pay R
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
