SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 6608

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rahul Dahel – Appellant
Versus
Gst – Respondent


ORDER (Oral)

Per:Justice M.G. SEWLIKAR, MEMBER (J)

We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents

2 The applicant has filed this OA for following -

l€S— I “8.(a) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case from the Respondents and after examining the same quash and set aside the order 10.10.2023 with all conse-

quential benefits.

8. (b) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to direct the Respondents to either declare the result of the Applicant and if the Applicant is de- clared pass in the examination, he may be con- firmed or the lien of the Applicant be maintained till the Applicant is confirmed in the present organiza-

tion with all consequential benefits.

8.(c) Costs ofthe Application be provide for.

8. (d) Any other and further order as this Hon'ble Tri- bunal deems fit in the nature and circumstances of the case be passed.” 1

3. The applicant had filed OA No. 888/2022 for setting aside illegal termination. That OA was al- lowed. The respondent no. 3 passed the order dated 22"“ of November, 2023 that the period of lien of the applicant shall stand extended till the declaration of result of the ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top