CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rahul Dahel – Appellant
Versus
Gst – Respondent
ORDER (Oral)
Per:Justice M.G. SEWLIKAR, MEMBER (J)
We have heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents
2 The applicant has filed this OA for following -
l€S— I “8.(a) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to call for the records of the case from the Respondents and after examining the same quash and set aside the order 10.10.2023 with all conse-
quential benefits.
8. (b) This Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to direct the Respondents to either declare the result of the Applicant and if the Applicant is de- clared pass in the examination, he may be con- firmed or the lien of the Applicant be maintained till the Applicant is confirmed in the present organiza-
tion with all consequential benefits.
8.(c) Costs ofthe Application be provide for.
8. (d) Any other and further order as this Hon'ble Tri- bunal deems fit in the nature and circumstances of the case be passed.” 1
3. The applicant had filed OA No. 888/2022 for setting aside illegal termination. That OA was al- lowed. The respondent no. 3 passed the order dated 22"“ of November, 2023 that the period of lien of the applicant shall stand extended till the declaration of result of the ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.