Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J
Manoj Kumar Son of Late Dwarika Prasad Mahto – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India Ltd. through its Chairman cum-Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of applicants and their employment status. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for regularization based on service duration. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. established rights for regularization based on criteria and service duration. (Para 23 , 28) |
| 4. court’s observations on management's failure to regularize workers. (Para 24 , 25 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final decision to regularize services with associated benefits. (Para 44 , 46) |
ORDER
AS PER:- AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. The applicantshave filed present original application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals, Act 1985 seeking direction to respondents to regularize services of the applicants on completion of more than ten years of their continuous services. So also to extend all service benefits to the applicants at par with regular employees of the Management. So also to direct respondents to regularize services as Management has already regularized 78 such employees similarly placed and not to discriminate applicants.
PRAYER
2. The applicantshave claimed following main reliefs (as extracted from the OA):-
(i) The Respondents be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
