Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ramesh Singh Thakur, Judicial Member, Rashmi Saxena Sahni, Administrative Member
Narinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's reliefs and factual background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. regularization policies and precedents (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. termination and similar cases (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. respondents' defense against regularization (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. court analysis of equity and policies (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. reappointment and one-time regularization (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
PER: RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, MEMBER (A)
1. Present original application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking following relief:-
“i) The letters dated 27.7.2021 (Annexure P-18) and dated 29.7.2021 (Annexures P-21) be quashed being illegal, unlawful, arbitrary, unconscionable & unconstitutional
ii) The respondents No.1 and 2 may kindly be directed not to replace the applicant with another casual/temporary/ outsourcing employee on the existing post of peon with the respondent department and permitting him to continue on the said post keeping in view excellent performance of the applicant since 30.7.2007 after his lawful selection amongst all eligible candidates in consonance with recruitment rules and Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
