Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member, Rajnish Kumar Rai, Judicial Member
Jaladhar Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of misappropriation, fir, acquittal, and disciplinary initiation. (Para 2) |
| 2. charges and enquiry proved misappropriation via witness evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. prior proceedings and applicant's acquittal-based arguments. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. different proof standards uphold departmental dismissal post-acquittal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Rajnish Kumar Rai, Judicial Member
The applicant has preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
“a) An order do issue directing the respondent authorities, their men, agent and subordinates to reinstate the applicant in his post thereby setting aside the order of dismissal from engagement and confirmation of such order of dismissal by the appellate authority;
b) An order directing the respondent authorities, their men and subordinates to set aside the order of the appellate authority vide No.-PMG(SB)/SF(Vig)/A-07/07/2019 dated 14.07.2020 forthwith;
c) An order do issue upon the concerned respondent authorities to forthwith produce and/or cause to be produced entire records relating to the applicants case and production to be made, render conscientious justice after p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
