CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, MEMBER(A), M. SWAMINATHAN, J
S. Vengadesan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
OA
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek quashing of seniority list and fresh preparation per 3:1 ratio. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. 3:1 quota mandatory; excess police constable appointments ad-hoc; seniority from driver appointment date. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. respondents claim compliance with central govt seniority rules and high court directions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. recruitment rules' 3:1 ratio violated; central rules inapplicable; excess appointments invalid. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. quash list; direct fresh 3:1 seniority with consequential benefits. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member )
This OA has been filed by the applicants seeking the following relief:
“(i) Quash the Final Seniority List of Driver (PD) Gr.III issued by the Respondent 5, in Memorandum No.407/Pol/Estt-I(A)/A3/2015 dated 18.08.2015;
(ii) Direct the Respondents 4 & 5 to prepare afresh the Seniority List of Driver (PD) Gr.III by-
a) interspersing the Police Constable and Home Guards who were appointed to the post of Driver (PD) Gr.III, in the ratio of 3:1; and
b) taking into account their actual date of appointment in the post of Driver (PD) Gr.III;
c) to give all consequential benefits such as financial upgradation under Assured Career Progression Scheme including arrears of pay; and also
(iii) Pass such other or further order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, are as follows:
The applicants were initially recruited as Home Guards in the Police Department of Puducherry during the years 1989, 1990, and 1991. In 1999, they were appointed as Driver (PD) Grade III through a Competency Test conducted by the Department. Originally, the Police Department had two categories of Driver posts: Police Constable (Driver) and Head Constable (Driver). In August, 1993, following a scheme introduced by the Government of India for Staff Car Drivers, the Police Department, Government of Puducherry amalgamated these two categories into a single Driver (PD) Gr.III category, with a graded structure and notified the Recruitment Rules for the restructured position. According to the Recruitment Rules, the post of Driver (PD) Grade III was to be filled by transfers from the grade of Police Constables and by absorption from the grade of Home Guards, in the ratio of 3:1. On the introduction date of this scheme, 01.08.1993, the scale of pay for Police Constables was Rs. 825- 1200, while the Driver position had a higher pay scale of Rs. 950-1500. Consequently, appointment of Police Constables to the restructured Driver (PD) Grade III post was considered promotion rather than transfer, as outlined in the Recruitment Rules. However, effective 01.01.1996, both posts were assigned identical pay scales, and from 01.01.2006, Police Constables were placed in a higher Grade Pay of Rs. 2000/-, while Driver (PD) Grade III was assigned a lesser Grade Pay of Rs. 1900/-. The Police Department filled 48 Driver (PD) Grade III posts—27 in November 1998 and 21 in September, 1999—exclusively with Police Constables, despite the availability of sufficient number of eligible Home Guards.
Subsequently, on 13.10.1999, the Department appointed only 15 Home Guards to the Driver (PD) Grade III position. On 10.08.2001, the Department published a seniority list of Drivers, omitting the names of those appointed from the Home Guards in October, 1999. Another seniority list was issued on 24.04.2008 and finalized on 25.03.2010. The Drivers (PD) Grade III from the Home Guards challenged this seniority list before this Tribunal in OA No. 407/2010. The Tribunal ordered on 27.11.2012 that the list be redone to reflect the seniority as requested for by the applicants. In response, the private respondents appealed to the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in WP No. 2684/2013. On 13.10.2014, the High Court directed the Department to reconsider the fixation of seniority with not


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.