Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rashmi Saxena Sahni, A, Ramesh Singh Thakur, J
Dr. Sangeeta Bagga Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration through its Administrator – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims against the applicant and administrative maneuvers. (Para 1 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 2. applicant’s qualifications and the background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's findings on the merit of complaints and the need for recruitment rules. (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 25 , 26) |
ORDER
PER: RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, MEMBER (A)
1. Present original application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking following relief:-
(i) Quash Order dated 19.07.2022 (Annexure A-1) vide which the additional charge for the post of Principal, Chandigarh College of Architecture, Chandigarh given to the applicant vide Order dated 21.09.2017 (Annexure A-8) has been withdrawn and assigned allegedly on interim basis to the Private Respondent by reviewing the Order dated 21.09.2017 issued in respect of the applicant in an illegal, arbitrary manner without any power and authority to review earlier order and the order is punitive and the same is based on internal enquiries into the complaints filed by two faculty members who are habitual complainants raising same allegation since year 2017 in which enquiry was conducted by High Powere
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
