Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Umesh Gajankush, J
Bhushan Ravindra Dhivare – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and context of the applicant’s transfer. (Para 2) |
| 2. observations on the legal basis for transfer policies. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. arguments about the legality and fairness of the transfer. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final ruling on the dismissal of the application based on found legal principles. (Para 15) |
ORAL
Per:Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Applicant before this Tribunal is challenging impugned transfer order dated 02nd August, 2024 (Annexure A-1) and representation rejection order dated 30th August, 2024 (Annexure A1-A). By the impugned transfer order, applicant has been transferred from DEO Pune to ADEO Port Blair.
2. Brief facts of the case stated in the OA are that;
2.1 By order dated 02nd August, 2024, applicant has been transferred from Pune to Port Blair. Applicant initially appointed on the post of Sub-Divisional Officer Grade-III in April, 2010. The said post subsequently came to be placed in Grade-II due to abolition of Grade–III post. The applicant is presently working in Grade-I due to his promotion in the year 2020. It is stated that initially in April 2010 applicant was posted in Mumbai and after having worked for about 7 years in Mumbai he c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
