SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.S. Radhakrishnan, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, JJ.
T.S.R. Subramanian & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.82 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.234 OF 2011
Decided On : 31-10-2013
(b) Administrative Law - Civil Services Board - Prayer for direction to Centre and State to constitute independent CSB at the Centre and State Level - Without executive control - Statutory in nature - Comprising of persons from outside the Government - No such positive direction can be given - However CSB comprising of in-service high ranking officers could be better alternative - Political executive could overrule recommendations of such CSB but with reasons - Enactment of Civil Service Act suggested - Setting up of CSB directed. (Para 27, 28)
(2006) 8 SCC 1 - Referred
(c) Administrative Law - Fixed Tenure of Civil Servants - Stability of tenure is necessary in public interest - Civil Servants must have a minimum fixed tenure - Direction given. (Para 31)
(d) Administrative Law - Governance - Oral instructions - All India Services Rules - Rule 3(3)(iii) - Necessity of recording orders/Instructions - All oral orders/instructions should be confirmed in writing - It is necessary for transparency in administration and for complying with RTI Act - Direction given. (Paras 33 to 35)
Facts of the case:
This writ petition has been filed by a few eminent retired civil servants highlighting the necessity of various reforms for preservation of integrity, fearlessness and independence of civil servants at the Centre and State levels in the country.
They have prayed for following reliefs:
(i) Order or direction requiring the Union of India to create an "independent" Civil Service Board or Commission both at the Centre and the State based on recommendations by the Hota Committee, 2004; the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission 2008; and the statement adopted at the Conference of Chief Ministers on Effective and Responsive Administration, 1997;
(ii) Stability of tenure based on recommendations by Jha Commission 1986; Central Staffing Scheme, 1996; the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission; Hota Committee Report, 2004;
(iii) Direction requiring the Union of India to mandate that every civil servant formally record all such instructions/directions/ orders/suggestions which he/she receives, not only from his/her administrative superiors but also from political authorities, legislators, commercial and business interests and other persons/quarters having interest, wielding influence or purporting to represent those in authority based on the principles recognized by Rule 3(3)(ii)(iii) of the All India Service Conduct Rules, 1968 and as implicitly recognized by the Santhanam Committee Report, 1962.
Finding of the Court:
There is need for secured tenure of civil servants and recorded orders /instructions rather than oral or verbal ones.
Result : Writ petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.
1. Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been invoked by few eminent retired civil servants highlighting the necessity of various reforms for preservation of integrity, fearlessness and independence of civil servants at the Centre and State levels in the country. Prayers made in this writ petition are based on various reports and recommendations made by several Committees appointed for improving the public administration. On the basis of various reports, following reliefs are sought in the writ petition :-
(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction requiring the Respondents to create an “independent” Civil Service Board or Commission both at the Centre and the State based on recommendations by the Hota Committee, 2004 (para 5.09, para 5.11, Main Recommendations No.38); the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission 2008 (10th Report, para 9.8); the statement adopted at the Conference of Chief Ministers on Effective and Responsive Administration, 1997;
(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction requiring the respondents to fixed tenure for civil servants ensuring stability based on recommendations by Jha Commission 1986 (para 7.2); Central Staffing Scheme, 1996 (para 17.01, para 17.02, para 17.03, para 17.12), the 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (10th Report, para 8.7, para 9.8, para 17.5), Hota Committee Report, 2004 (Main Recommendations No.39);
(iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction requiring the respondents to mandate that every civil servant formally record all such instructions/directions/ orders/suggestions which he/she receives, not only from his/her administrative superiors but also from political authorities, legislators, commercial and business interests and other persons/quarters having interest, wielding influence or purporting to represent those in authority based on the principles recognized by Rule 3(3)(ii)(iii) of the All India Service Conduct Rules, 1968 and as implicitly recognized by the Santhanam Committee Report, 1962 (Section 6, sub-para 33[iii].
2. This Court, considering the importance of the matter, issued notice to various State Governments and the Union Territories so as to ascertain their views on the various issues raised in this case. Most of the States have filed detailed counter affidavits explaining their stand with regard to the reliefs prayed for in this writ petition.
3. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the writ petitioners, referred elaborately to the above-mentioned reports and highlighted the necessity of the creation of a Civil Service Board (for short ‘CSB’), both at the Centre and State level, with a degree of independence so that it can make recommendations on all transfers and postings without sacrificing the executive freedom of the Government. Learned senior counsel pointed out that such CSB shall function in a bare advisory capacity and its recommendations will not impose any constraint on the independence of the political authority to effect postings and transfers, including premature transfers. Learned senior counsel also highlighted the necessity for providing a fixed tenure for civil servants ensuring stability which is highly necessary for implementing various programmes which will have social and economic impact on the society. Learned senior counsel also highlighted the reasons for recoding of instructions, directions and orders by the civil servants so that they can function independently and the possibility of arbitrary and illegal decisions could be avoided.
4. Mr. Paras Kuhad, learned ASG appearing for the Union of India, opposed in principle prayer for setting up of independent CSB at the Centre and the State levels, which, according to the learned ASG, would be interfering with the governmental functions. Learned ASG also submitted that any mechanism wit
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.