Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V. Bhairavia, J, Hukum Singh Meena, A
Mohit Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. determination of performance grading and adverse remarks. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. process and fairness in administrative evaluations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial review of administrative decisions in performance assessments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. corrective measures and expungement of unsubstantiated remarks. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Jayesh V. Bhairavia, Member (J):
The applicant during the period from 05.11.2020 to 22.3.2021 was posted as Additional Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax, Ahmedabad South, Gujarat. In the Annual Performance Appraisal Report (hereinafter referred to as ‘APAR’) for the period, i.e. 05.11.2020 to 22.3.2021, the Reporting Authority had given grading of ‘9.17’ to him. However, the Reviewing Authority had downgraded the said grading of ‘9.17’ to ‘7.44’ with certain adverse comments. Therefore, being aggrieved, the applicant had filed an online representation dated 26.11.2021 before the competent authority. The same had been considered by the APAR Referral Board which was partly allowed vide order dated 16.6.2022 (Annexure A/1 refer). Although the said APAR Referral Board had upgraded the overall grading of the applicant from ‘Very Good’ to ‘
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
