Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Justice Ranjit More, CJ, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, ACJ
Sh. Anil Kumar Kashyap – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of the applicant's initial appointment and the misconduct allegations. (Para 2) |
| 2. discussion on authority and procedural correctness in issuing the charge sheet. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's defense on procedural compliance and challenges to respondent's authority. (Para 4) |
| 4. analysis of the implications of delay in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. final dismissal of the application based on thorough legal reasoning. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By way of the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-
“(a) Quash and set aside the impugned charge sheet dated 13.9.2022 and impugned office order dt. 13.1.2023 (Annexure A-1, A-2)
(b) To grant any other further relief as deemed fit and proper by this Hon’ble Tribunal in the facts and circumstances of the case along with the cost and expenses of the present litigation.”
FACTS OF THE CASE
2. The applicant was initially appointed as Scientific Officer (SB/Engineer-in SB, Delhi) on 17.11.1989 by National Informatics Centre (in short ‘NIC’) and subsequently promoted to th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
