Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, J, Mr. Mohan Pyare, A
Ashish Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion challenges due to procedural irregularities surrounding acr communication. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the necessity of communication in acrs for fairness. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's finding on violations of natural justice in non-communication of acr. (Para 10 , 12 , 20) |
| 4. final order and directions given to reconsider promotions on acr basis. (Para 21) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Shri Santosh Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajni Kant Rai, learned counsel for the official respondents, were present at the time of hearing. None present for the respondent no. 6 to 9 despite service of notice.
2. The instant original application has been filed seeking following relief:
“i. The Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to partially quash and set aside the impugned order / panel No. E/Veedyut/Non-running/J.E.25% / Talent Quota / 15 dated 29.04.2015 by DPO, N.C. Railway, Allahabad (Annexure A-1) empanelling the respondent no. 7, 8, 9 being procedural irregularities committed by the Selection Committee in the selection of Junior Engineer (Electrical) against 25% talented quota vacancies.
ii. Any other s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
