SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(SC) 4360

M.R. SHAH, C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ
R.K. JIBANLATA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anantham Henry, Mr. Anantham Rohen Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar, Mr. Mohan Singh, Ms. Priyambica M K Jha, Mr. Aniket Rajput, Ms. Priyanka, Mr. Kumar Mihir
For the Respondents: Mr. R. Bala Subramanian, Mr. David Ahongsangbam, Mr. Rajeev Mahunta, Mr. K.C. Jha, Ms. Rajkumari Banju, Mr. Maibam Nabaghanashyam Singh, Mr. Kumar Mihir

ORDER

It is very unfortunate that the High Court has misunderstood our earlier judgment and order dated 24.02.2023. Our judgment and order is very clear by which this Court directed to reconsider the case of the original writ petitioner for promotion considering the ACRs of 2017-18 and 2018-19. The Administrative side of the High Court is bound to consider the same in its true letter and spirit.

There was no question of fresh DPC to consider the case of the other selected candidates also. In fact, their services are already protected.

The High Court is directed to act as per our earlier judgment and order dated 24.02.2023 in its true letter and spirit within a period of 2 weeks from today and submit the compliance report before this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top