Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SUNIL THOMAS, J, V.Rama Mathew, ACJ
T.G.Gopinathan Nair, Purushothaman Pillai.R, M.N.Radhakrishna Pillai, A.K.Aravindakshan, P.R.Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of applicants' pay requests. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for pay parity under the cds rules. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observation on pay entitlement. (Para 12) |
| 4. main reasoning behind the tribunal's ruling. (Para 13) |
| 5. final decision regarding the applicants' pay. (Para 14) |
ORDER
HON'BLE Ms.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
Having heard both sides in extenso, the following order is passed –
The applicants had joined the Military Engineer Service (MES) as Stenographers in the grade of Upper Division Clerk (UDC). Subsequently, they were promoted as Assistants, Office Superintendents and later as Administrative Officers Grade II on different dates as specified below -
| Sl. No. | Name | Date of promotion as AO-2 | GP granted | GP due on promotion | Date of completion of 4 years as AO-2 | GP due |
| 1 | T.G.Gopinathan Nair | 11/02/13 | 4600 | 4800 | 11/02/17 | 5400 |
| 2 | Purushothaman Pillai R | 07/02/13 | 4600 | 4800 | 07/02/17 | 5400 |
| 3 | M.N.Radhakrishna Pillai | 28/07/08 | 4600 | 4800 | 28/07/12 | 5400 |
| 4 | A.K.Aravindakshan | 09/01/12 | 4600 | 4800 | 09/01/16 | 5400 |
| 5 | P.R.Rajan | 06/02/13 | 4600 | 4800 | 06/02/17 | 5400 |
2. At the time of filing of the O.A., the 1st and 2nd applicants were working as Administrative Officer Grade – I and the 3rd to 5th applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
