CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Pratima K Gupta, J, Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, A
MADAN LAL TANWAR, RAKESH KUMAR BHATIA, VIJENDER KUMAR VERMA, ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, SMT NEERJA NANDA – Appellant
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. retired employees sought financial fairness. (Para 2) |
| 2. court emphasized pension calculation based on increments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. final order mandates compliance with supreme court guidelines. (Para 5) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Ms. Pratima K Gupta, Member (J):
The applicants in the present OA retired from service on
30th June/31st December of their respective year of superannuation and seek one annual increment due from 01st July/1st January, which has not been extended to the applicants only on the ground that they retired one day earlier. Being aggrieved, the applicants filed the present OA and prayed the following reliefs:-
“i) Call for the relevant file(s)/record(s) of the Respondent and peruse the same;
ii) issue directions to the Respondent(s) to grant one notional increment from 1st July of the respective years of the retirement to all the Applicants for the purpose of calculating their revised pensionary benefits. that consequently in case of all Applicants their pension and pensionary benefits comprising of DCRG, Leave Encashment and Commutation of Pension be revised based on such additional notional increment and they may be allowed/paid arrears thereof upto the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.