SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(SC) 10756

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA, CJ, SANJAY KUMAR, J
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M. SIDDARAJ – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv., Mr. Santosh Krishnan, AOR, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G., Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, AOR, Ms. Srija Choudhury, Adv., Mr. Anant, Adv., Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR, Mrs. Shirin Khajuria, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ranu Purohit, AOR, Ms. Swati Tiwari, Adv., Ms. Niharika Singh, Adv., Mr. Yashas Rk, Adv., Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv., Mr. Athul Joseph, Adv., Mr. Kumar Mihir, AOR, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G., Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv., Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv., Ms. Aashta Singh, Adv., Mr. Satya Jha, Adv., Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR, Mr. R Venkataramani, Attorney General for India, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G., Mr. Amit Sharma (B), Adv., Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv., Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv., Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv., Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR, Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Sr. Adv., Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv., Mrs. Samina S, Adv., Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv., Mr. Shivraj Singh, Adv., M/s. Nuli & Nuli, AOR, Mr. Devesh Kumar Chauvia, Adv., Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Lather Mukul Kanwar Singh, AOR, Mrs. Shirin Khajuria, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ranu Purohit, AOR, Ms. Swati Tiwari, Adv., Ms. Niharika Singh, Adv., Mr. Yashas Rk, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. Anubhav, Adv., Mr. Vijay Pal, Adv., Mr. Bikash Chandra, Adv., Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Yashwant Singh Yadav, Adv., Mr. Arvind, Adv., Mrs. Preeti Yadav, Adv., Mr. Om Prakash, Adv., Mr. Umang Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Harshal Kulkarni, Adv., Mr. Vidya Sagar, Adv., Mr. Amolak, Adv., Ms. Bano Deswal, Adv., Ms. Tannu, Adv., Mr. R. C. Kaushik, AOR, Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T. R, AOR, Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR, Mrs. Kiran Bhardwaj, AOR, Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwari, Adv., Mr. A. K. Sinha, Adv., Ms. Anu Mohla, Adv., Mr. Nishant R. Kanteshwarkar, AOR

ORDER

Miscellaneous Application Diary Nos. 2400/2024, 35783/2024, 35785/2024 and 35786/2024 Delay condoned.

We had passed the following interim order dated 06.09.2024, the operative portion of which reads as under:

“(a) The judgment dated 11.04.2023 will be given effect to in case of third parties from the date of the judgment, that is, the pension by taking into account one increment will be payable on and after 01.05.2023. Enhanced pension for the period prior to 31.04.2023 will not be paid.

(b) For persons who have filed writ petitions and succeeded, the directions given in the said judgment will operate as res judicata, and accordingly, an enhanced pension by taking one increment would have to be paid.

(c) The direction in (b) will not apply, where the judgment has not attained finality, and cases where an appeal has been preferred, or if filed, is entertained by the appellate court.

(d) In case any retired employee has filed any application for intervention/impleadment in Civil Appeal No. 3933/2023 or any other writ petition and a beneficial order has been passed, the enhanced pension by including one increment will be payable from the month in which the application for intervention

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top