Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, J, MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, A
Rohit Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks appointment based on the waiting list's validity. (Para 3 , 5 , 10) |
| 2. representation made within waiting list validity supports claim for appointment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. vacancy arising during list validity must lead to fair consideration of claims. (Para 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. rejection of claim based on sro 60 application was arbitrary. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The SWP/WP(C) No. 2437/2018 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A. No. 61/48/2023 by the Registry of this Tribunal.
2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court with following prayer:
a) “allow the present writ petition;
b) quash Communication No. RD&PR/ Estt./131/2016 dated 26.09.2018, whereby and whereunder, the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of VLW has been rejected on the misplaced ground, that the same is not covered under SRO 60 dated 02.02.2018;
c) command and direct the respondents, to appoint the petitioner as VLW against the vacancy against which respondent No. 4 was selected but his selection cancelled ab-initio vide Order No. 224 SSB of 2017
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
