Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, JJ
Rajeev Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Comptroller & Auditor General of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the applicant's disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the misconduct and charges against the applicant. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments from both parties regarding procedural issues and allegations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's evaluation of the disciplinary authority's adherence to procedures. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's findings on the sufficiency of evidence and nature of penalties. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal standards regarding judicial review in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. conclusion about the legality and validity of the prior proceedings. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. final ruling and dismissal of the application. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Shri Arun Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:
8.1 To consider for issuing orders or directions, in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned revision order dated 08.06.2015 and office order dated 09.07.2015 relat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
