Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
Ms. Manju Dhyani – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual details of the corruption case (Para 2 , 8) |
| 2. arguments and defenses presented by both parties (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of inquiry procedures and findings (Para 6 , 7 , 14) |
| 4. decision made post inquiry against the applicant (Para 12 , 18) |
| 5. final conclusions and orders of the court (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs: -
“(a) Call for the Record of the case
(b) Set aside and quash the impugned orders of forfeiture reduction of in service pay and with of proportionate also period of suspension not spent on duty, passed vide ANN-A as well as order of rejection of appeal passed vide ANN-B with all consequential benefits.
(c)Pass any such order (s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case (d) Award cost of proceedings”
FACTS OF THE CASE AS STATED BY THE APPLICANT
2. The applicant was enlisted in Delhi Police as a woman constable on 21.07.1988 and rose upto the rank of an ASI. On 05.04.2014, one Mr. Mohd Usman came to lodge a report regarding loss of purse which h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
