SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13006

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, J, Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Partha Narayan Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A.350/223/2024



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Mr. A.K. Manna
For the Respondents: Mr. V. Kundalia, Ms. E. Sinha

The tribunal affirmed that similar employees' pay should be upgraded equally, addressing violations of equality in pay scales and ensuring equitable treatment among all central government employees.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - The applicant sought relief against the arbitrary denial of replacement scales effective from 01.01.1996, claiming it violated principles of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Tribunal found that the Government's decisions were discriminatory as they unjustly denied retrospective pay scale benefits to the applicant while similar employees received them. (Paras 12, 13, 15)

(B) Equal Pay for Equal Work - The principle was emphasized, affirming that similarly placed individuals should not face different treatment. The Tribunal directed pay to be fixed notationally from 01.01.1996 and actually from 21.04.2004, rectifying the inequity.

(C)

Findings of Court:
The denial of benefits due to arbitrary governmental decisionsviolated principles of fair treatment as established by prior cases, necessitating equal benefits for all similarly situated employees within the same department.

(D)

Result: The Establishment Order was quashed, and the respondents were ordered to extend the revised pay scales with consequential benefits.

Table of Content
1. summary of the applicant's claims and background information. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by applicant and respondents regarding pay scale discrepancies. (Para 3 , 7 , 8)
3. courts emphasis on equal treatment and application of pay benefits. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. legal reasoning behind the decisions in favor of the applicant. (Para 10 , 14)
5. final verdict and directive to grant pay benefits. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER

Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:

The applicant has preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-

i) Declare the action of the respondents in giving the benefit of the replacement scales for Commissioners/ Superintendents Central Exercise/Superintendents of Customs/Appraisers, with effect from 21.04.2004, and not with effect from 01.01.1996, vide Office Memorandum No.F.No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 (Annexure A-01) as arbitrary, discriminatory and thus illegal;

ii) Direct the Respondents to pay to the applicant Rs. 6500 x 10,500 & Rs.7,500-Rs.12,000/- on notional basis from 01.01.1996 and actual basis w.e.f.21.04.2004 with all consequential benefits as made vide F.No.C- 18011/ASHIS CHAKRABORTY/2009 VNL/4743, dated 22.09.2023 including arrears of pay within a specified time limit;

iii) Direct the respondents to pay interest @ 12% per annum on the arrears on account of revision of pay;

iv) Quash and or set aside impugned Estt. Order No.12/2024, dated 12.01.2024;

v) Pass such other direction or directions order or orders as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper to meet the ends of justice.”

2. Brief facts of this case are as under:-

(a) The applicant was appointed as Inspector of Customs prior to 01.01.1996 in the then existing scale of pay of Rs.1640-Rs.2900 which was subsequently revised to Rs.2000-3200 and thereafter to Rs.5500-9000 (as per recommendation of Vth CPC). Subsequently he was promoted to the post of Superintendent and further elevated to the post of Assistant Commissioner.

(b) After implementation of the Vth CPC w.e.f. 01.01.1996, parity between the Inspectors of CBI/IB and the Inspectors of Central Excise & Customs which had existed till the time of IVth CPC was disrupted and it significantly affected all the promotional posts in the hierarchy viz. Superintendents and Assistant Commissioners in the matter of scale of pay.

(c) The pay scale of the Inspectors in the Department prior to 1996 was on par with similar posts in the organized Accounts Department i.e, Senior Accounts Officer, Comptroller & Auditor General Department, Divisional Accountant, Labour Department, Section Officer, Central Secretariat Staff (CSS) Department, Assistant Grade, Railway Department, Accounts Staff, Income Tax Department, which were classified as Grade-C Non-Gazetted prior to 1996.

(d) Pursuant to the Vth Central Pay Commission in the year 1996, all the posts similar to the posts of Inspector of Central Excise & Customs Department were placed in the pay scale of Rs.5500-175- 9000/- as a result of which the parity between the Inspectors of CBI/IB and the Inspectors of Central Excise and Customs which had existed prior to 01.01.1996 was disrupted and it significantly affected all the promotional posts in the hierarchy viz. Superintendents and Assistant Commissioners in the matter of scale of pay.

(e) All India Federation of Central Excise Officers Association had filed O.A.No.45 of 1992 and O.A.No. 63 of 1997 before the Guwahati Bench of this Tribunal seeking payment of revised pay scales. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Guwahati Bench vide orders dated 19.01.2001 in O.A.No.45 of 1992 and O.A.No. 63 of 1997 held that there was hostile discrimination in pay scales between the posts of Senior Auditors in IA & AD Department and the Assistants of Central Secretariat Staff (CSS) and directed to grant pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 (pre-revised), corresponding to revised pay scale of Rs.5500-9000/- The said order was challenged by the Department

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top