Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, J, Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Partha Narayan Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the applicant's claims and background information. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by applicant and respondents regarding pay scale discrepancies. (Para 3 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. courts emphasis on equal treatment and application of pay benefits. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal reasoning behind the decisions in favor of the applicant. (Para 10 , 14) |
| 5. final verdict and directive to grant pay benefits. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:
The applicant has preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
i) Declare the action of the respondents in giving the benefit of the replacement scales for Commissioners/ Superintendents Central Exercise/Superintendents of Customs/Appraisers, with effect from 21.04.2004, and not with effect from 01.01.1996, vide Office Memorandum No.F.No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 (Annexure A-01) as arbitrary, discriminatory and thus illegal;
ii) Direct the Respondents to pay to the applicant Rs. 6500 x 10,500 & Rs.7,500-Rs.12,000/- on notional basis from 01.01.1996 and actual basis w.e.f.21.04.2004 with all consequential benefits as made vide F.No.C- 18011/ASHIS C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
