Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta Sen, J, Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Debashis Ganguly – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims for retroactively adjusted pay scales. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion of administrative responsibilities in pay determination. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. necessity for equitable treatment under the law. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. judicial orders necessitate action against unreasonable disparities. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:
The applicants have preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
a) An order quashing and/or setting aside the general rejection vide Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes communications dated 25.07.2023 at Annexure A-3 to the Original Application;
b) An order quashing and/or setting aside the communications individually made to the applicants being dated 14.12.2023, 07.12.2023, 21.02.2024, 15.11.2023, 16.02.2024, 19.02.2024, 16.01.2024, 12.12.2023, 12.12.2023 and 28.12.2023 at Annexure A-4 collectively;
c) An order directing the respondents to grant the benefits of upgraded Pay Scales granted by the Office Memorandum dated 21.04.2004 to the applicants w.e.f.01.01.1996 notionally with all consequential monetary benefits ins
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
