Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Urmita Datta Sen, J, Mr. Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Subrata Mitra – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, service through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimants argue for retrospective pay fix. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents refute claims based on delay. (Para 3) |
| 3. court considers previous rulings on pay. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. affirmation of equal treatment across departments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. tribunal orders compliance for effective date benefits. (Para 15) |
| 6. o.a. stands disposed of with directives. (Para 16) |
ORDER
Urmita Datta Sen, Judicial Member
The applicant has preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
i) “Declare the action of the respondents in giving the benefit of the replacement scales for Commissioners/ Superintendents Central Exercise/Superintendents of Customs/Appraisers, with effect from 21.04.2004, and not with effect from 01.01.1996, vide Office Memorandum No.F.No.6/37/98-IC dated 21.04.2004 (Annexure A-01) as arbitrary, discriminatory and thus illegal;
ii) Direct the Respondents to pay to the applicant Inspectors, Superintendents/Appraisers/Assistant Commissioners of Customs/Central Exercise (all retired) under Department of Revenue of Ministry of Finance replacement scale(s) viz. Rs. 6500 x 10,500 & Rs.7,500-Rs.12,000/- on notional
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
