SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13010

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Urmita Datta Sen, J, Mr. Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Pinaki Mondal, Manoranjan Biswas, Sumanta Pal, Ajay Kumar Saha, Dayamoy Bhattacharjee, Samir Sengupta, Umesh Chandra Cahubey, Achintya Kumar Chakraborti, Sailen Kumar Naskar, Ashim Roy Chowdhury, Arun Kumar Prabhakar, Amitava Saha, Abhijit Bhattacharyya, Dipankar Sarkar, Saurabh Das, Keshab Charan Malik, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Dipankar Patra, Surajit Mukherjee, Santanu Acharya, Tapas Saha, Lakpa Tshering Bhutia, Saikat Das, Sumita Bedi, Krishna Pada Das, Swapan Kumar Majumdar, Bharati Singh, Samiran Maitra, Amarendra Kumar, Mr. Sheetal Madhavrao Shinde – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicants: Mr. A.K. Manna
For the Respondents: Ms. A. Rajyashree, Mr. U. S. Bhattacharyya

Table of Content
1. claim for pay fixation under equal treatment principle. (Para 2)
2. defense against entitlement based on past inaction. (Para 3 , 8)
3. review of judicial precedents affecting claims. (Para 4 , 5 , 9 , 10)
4. equality and fairness in wage determination. (Para 11 , 13)
5. quashing of prior order and extension of pay benefits. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER

Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:

The applicants have preferred this O.A. under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-

2. Brief facts of this case are as under:-

(a) The applicants were appointed mostly as Inspectors of Customs on different dates prior to 01.01.1996 in the then existing scale of pay of Rs.1640-Rs.2900 which was subsequently revised to Rs.2000- 3200 and thereafter to Rs.5500-9000 (as per recommendation of Vth CPC). Subsequently they were promoted to the posts of Superintendent and some of them were elevated to the post of Assistant Commissioner/Dy. Commissioner.

(b) After implementation of the Vth CPC w.e.f. 01.01.1996, parity between the Inspectors of CBI/IB and the Inspectors of Central Excise & Customs which had existed till the time of IVth CPC was disrupted and it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top