CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
M.S. LATIF, M (Judl.), PRASANT KUMAR, M (Admn.)
Dr. Waseem Raja – Appellant
Versus
U.T of Jammu & Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on conflicting communications regarding appointment. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 2. significance of equitable consideration in employment decisions. (Para 25 , 26 , 28 , 33) |
ORDER
Per M.S.LATIF, M (J)
01. The instant O.A has been filed by the petitioner, being aggrieved of ab-initio withdrawal of recommendation in his favour as Assistant Professor, Botany. Following reliefs have been prayed for in this petition
“A. That the impugned decision in terms whereof the recommendation made in favour of the applicant has been withdrawn ab initio as communicated in terms of the communication bearing no. PSC/DR/AP/Botany/2019 dated 06-06-2023 and the impugned communications both dated 06-06-2023, be set aside and quashed.
B. That the show cause notice bearing no. HED-GAZ/176/2023-04 dated 03-08-2023 be set aside and quashed.
C. That the respondents be restrained from proceeding ahead against the applicant in respect of the subject matter of the impugned show cause notice bearing no. HEDGAZ/176/2023-04 dated 03-08-2023”.
02. Alongside the main relief the petitioner has sought for interim relief which reads as under:
“Pending adjudication of the O.A., the impugned decision of withd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.