SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 65

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J
Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Sunil
For the Respondents: Shri Shree Prakash Rai

ORDER:-

Heard Shri Sunil, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Shree Prakash Rai, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing.

2. The instant Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 , by the applicant for quashing of the impugned order dated 27.02.2023 and 13.10.2018 passed by respondent-3 & 4, by which the application of the applicant for compassionate appointment has been rejected. Further, prayer has been made for a direction upon the respondents to provide the appointment to the applicant on compassionate ground.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the applicant’s father while working as Sub-Postmaster under the respondents’ department died in harness on 17.10.2014, leaving behind his widow, applicant and one married daughter. Subsequently, applicant preferred an application before the respondent-4 for appointment of the applicant on compassionate appointment on 17.03.2016 along with no objection certificate by other dependant family member(s).

3.1 Thereafter, the Respondent-2 vide order dated 13.10.2018, whereby the case of the applicant for compassionate appointment was not recommended on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top