CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, B Anand, Administrative Member
Manjeet – Appellant
Versus
Staff Selection Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants challenge withheld results post-qualification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ssc withholds 625 results for malpractice scrutiny. (Para 5) |
| 3. applicants deny malpractice, seek provisional appointment. (Para 6) |
| 4. oas dismissed; liberty to re-approach post-trial. (Para 10) |
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J): -
Since common questions of fact and law arise in the present batch of O.As., they were heard together and are now being disposed of by way of this common order, with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, O.A. No. 635/2022, titled “Manjeet & Ors. Vs. Union of India &
Ors.” (as amended), is being treated as the lead case.
2. By way of the present O.A., the applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(i) To quash & set aside the final result of dated 15.12.2021 (List-II) in respect of applicants herein whereby the result of applicants (within 625 candidates) have been kept withheld on the ground of “for further scrutiny by the Commission regarding suspected use of unfair means” in selection process to the post of Constable (Executive) Male and Female in Delhi Police Examination-2020 and


Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.